The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office, the ICO, announced on Friday last week that it had served Google with an enforcement noticerequiring the search-engine giant to delete all so called “payload data” it collected as part of its Street View project.
The ICO, the UK’s privacy regulator set up with a remit to “uphold information rights in the public interest, [and] promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals”, gave Google just 35 days to comply with the notice.
Although Google have escaped a fine over this data breach, according to the BBC the breach failed to “meet the level required to issue a monetary penalty”, failure to comply with the enforcement notice is a serious matter. And according to Stephen Eckersley, the ICO’s Head of Enforcement, would be considered as contempt of court; a criminal offence under UK law.
This latest, and likely to be final ruling over Google’s UK 2010 Street View activities comes after a protracted investigation. The initial investigation was only instigated after Google itself admitted itself on its official blogthat its Street View cars had accidentally collected information from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks.
At the time the ICO believed that the payload data didn’t contain any “meaningful personal details” and that the data couldn’t be linked to identify any individuals. Although the ICO decided to take no action, the US Federal Communications Commission, the FFC, carried out its own investigation – the findings of the FFC and its report ultimately fining Google $25,000 for deliberatively obstructing and delaying the FFC’s investigation. The German authorities likewise took a dim view to Google’s activities. Imposing a fine of £128,000, the maximum fine permissible under German data and privacy laws, the regulator claimed that the Street View data collection was one of the “biggest know data protection violations in history.”
It is the public of the FFC report, and in particular the concerns raised about the actions of the Google Engineer who developed the Street View data collection software, that prompted the ICO to re-open its investigation.
The ICO itself felt that the lack of proper supervision of these engineers, including an audit of the Street View software code to determine exactly what it did, was a serious procedural and management failing. Although Google had intended to map the location of Wi-Fi networks, a piece of code created by Google Engine Marius Milner has the unintended consequence of also collecting vast amounts of private data being sent by individuals over their unsecured Wi-Fi connections.
The ICO’s investigation fell short however of stating, as others have, that Google has a corporate policy of collecting as much information as it can about individuals, and dealing with the issue of privacy and laws if and when they got caught.
In a shot across the bows of Google, the ICO said that going forward it would take a “keen interest” in the operations of Google and would “not hesitate to take action if further serious compliance issues [came] to its attention.”
James Barnes, StatusCake.com