Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021



If you’re in the software development space, or just started a career in software development you’ve probably heard people talking about DevOps. Studies show that 74% of companies have implemented DevOps in some fashion, but what is it exactly?
First described by Patrick Debois in 2007 (Patrick being commonly known as the “Godfather of DevOps”), DevOps is a portmanteau of “development” and “operations,” and it refers to bringing the Development and Operations teams together forming a collaborative approach of building applications. The goal of DevOps is to produce better, more reliable software products.
In this blog post, I’ll take a closer look at the key points of what DevOps is and the improvements it brings to businesses.
DevOps isn’t one specific thing like a programming language or a specific tool. It’s the culture and philosophy that takes teams that have been isolated in the past, bringing them together to better coordinate and collaborate.
Historically, development and operations teams have been separate entities, with their own sets of processes and ideas of how things should be run. Developers would create a product, deploy it, and then pass the responsibility of dealing with any user issues, updates, and general business support to the operations team.
This was a raw deal for the operations team, as they were not involved in the products development their product knowledge would probably be limited to the provided documentation and if they were lucky a brief training course. This also isn’t a great arrangement for the development team as without the operations team’s insights, perspectives, and experience with the business domain they would be solely relying on the requirements document for guidance (which is almost always missing something!).
Bringing the teams together allows a more informed and therefore superior product to be released faster, with fuller features and smaller periodic updates.
Despite the name, DevOps isn’t limited to just the development and operations teams, it’s not uncommon for businesses to also include quality engineers and security specialists from other teams for their valuable input.
DevOps primarily influences the application lifecycle. Broken down into four sections, which work in a continuous loop.
Each section of the loop depends on the other sections. Each section is not limited to a specific role, with each person on the team involved in multiple sections of the lifecycle (or perhaps all of them). The four sections are:
There are 4 common practices that any DevOps team should be making use of. These are:
– Continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD)
Continuous integration (CI) is the process of automating and integrating code changes and updates from multiple team members during software development. In CI, automated tools confirm that software code passes a suite of tests and error checks before it’s integrated, this helps detect code bugs and speeds up new releases.
Continuous delivery (CD) means that new software can be pushed into production multiple times a day, automating the delivery of applications to infrastructure environments. CD is a key part of DevOps, which helps shorten the software development lifecycle.
– Microservices
This practice structures an application as a collection of smaller services. In theory, these services are easy to maintain, more testable, independently deployable, and can be owned by a small team. You can read my write up on Microservices here Microservices vs Monoliths explained
– Monitoring and logging
This involves using tools to track metrics and store and interrogate data logs to see how the application is performing. These tools can be used for passive and active troubleshooting, allowing you to find the root causes of problems and unexpected changes as well as being proactive about any issues, helping minimise downtime.
– Communication and collaboration
Solid communication is critical to the success of a DevOps team. This might be done through active chat and file sharing using tools such as Microsoft Teams or Slack. Project tracking systems such as Jira or Float, or team wiki tools like confluence.
Successful implementation of the DevOps strategy requires an organisation-wide culture shift. It’s not just about using “DevOps” tools and processes but getting all the stakeholders of a project involved and collaborating to produce the best product possible.
I hope you find this overview of DevOps informative and useful.
Share this
4 min read How AI Is Shifting Software Engineering’s Primary Constraint For most of the history of software engineering, the primary constraint was production. Code was expensive, skilled engineers were scarce, and shipping features required concentrated human effort. Velocity was limited by how fast people could reason, implement, test, and deploy. That constraint shaped everything from team size,
5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t
6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff
5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021