StatusCake

Websites of 40% of UK e-Commerce Firms Experience Downtime During Seasonal Traffic Peaks

change log

According to a recent report by international data services provider Cogeco Peer 1, about 40% of major UK e-commerce firms experience periods of website downtime during seasonal traffic peaks. The findings come from a survey of over 100 e-commerce decision-makers at major UK online retailers.

The survey also found that 48% of the respondents thought that their companies were not completely prepared for increased website traffic during peak selling seasons, while 56% noted that their website experienced slower loading speeds during seasonal peaks in 2016 and 2017.

Commenting on the survey, Cogeco Peer 1 Vice President and General Manager, EMEA Susan Bowen said: “Retailers and brands are facing considerable challenges when selling online: from how to compete with the likes of Amazon and how social media is transforming shopping; to harnessing the power of automation and maintaining a uniform, effective online presence 24/7. The figures in the study highlight the need for UK retailers to act if they are to take full advantage of the revenue opportunities available during seasonal peak spending periods.

“Tech is an underpinning element to the success of all online retail brands today. Deciding when to make an upgrade is critical. Struggles during Easter can be a powerful indicator that this technology is creaking under the strain and holding retailers back during the biggest spending weekends of the year. It’s a tough question, but retailers all over the country need to ask themselves now, whether the tech infrastructure they are using is fit for purpose and whether it can support them through 2017’s seasonal shopping peaks.

“Brands can be as creative as they like with advertising and social media communications, but without a tech infrastructure that can meet the most strenuous demands of today’s online consumers, UK e-commerce brands will continue to miss out on these vital revenue streams.”

The results of the survey confirm the need for online retailers to ensure that their websites can handle increased traffic as more customers turn to purchasing items online rather than at physical stores. A study conducted by PwC and Local Data Company last year found that in the first half of 2016, over 2,600 brick-and-mortar stores on the UK’s high streets ceased operations. The closure rate averaged 15 retail outlets each day, which was an increase from 14 outlets per day recorded in the same time frame in 2015. The biggest net decrease in retail outlets in the country occurred in Greater London, where 164 stores closed their doors. This trend emphasizes that retailers must take steps to maximize their revenue during peak online selling times, such as Cyber Weekend.

Peak online sales periods, such as Cyber Monday, Black Friday, Boxing Day, and Easter, added over £7 billion in sales to the UK economy in 2016. These peak periods represent a large percentage of annual revenue for e-commerce firms, so maximising their revenue during these periods can often make the difference between having a profitable year and experiencing a loss.

Share this

More from StatusCake

Designing Alerts for Action

3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams

A Notification List Is Not a Team

3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years

Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision

3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.

The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most

4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already

When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them

3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,

When AI Speeds Up Change, Knowing First Becomes the Constraint

5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things

Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?

Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021

*By providing your email address, you agree to our privacy policy and to receive marketing communications from StatusCake.