Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
Rome wasn’t built in a day, but Angry Birds was such a low priority in the work-flow of Finnish company Rovio that it took a team of four people over eight months to build the game – for a miserly budget of only £70,000.
Little wonder then that competitors of Rovio were a little dismissive of the company’s grand ambition for Angry Bird – a mere 100,000,000 downloads; but when Rovio announced this week that Angry Birds is to make its debut this weekend as a short animated cartoon series, the app had already passed the 1.7bn yardstick.
These new animated shorts will not only be available in-game, but critically from Rovio’s marketing perspective, via TV networks in countries across the world from Australia, Brazil, Germany and India. As well as Rovio’s home market of Finland almost a dozen television networks have agreed to distribute the 52 part animated series.
For any app production house or social gaming company, particularly those with a freemium model where only a small percentage of users will pay to use the product – whether through buying the “full” game or buying in-game power-ups – the rush to land-grab customers is critical. And the biggest barrier to success is often the size of the marketing budget needed to succeed.
But Rovio are clear in their thinking- that having an on-screen presence for Angry Birds means a far wider and more engaged audience than the company would ever find if they took the normal approach to marketing the app.
So does this mean that social gaming which has seen such a meteoric rise online is going to turn back to traditional media in order to capture the big audience it needs to sustain itself? Perhaps. King.com, the leading games site, has started promoting its Bubble Witch Saga title with television advertising in the UK. It’s not beyond the realms of possibility that companies such as King.com will be looking at Rovio’s deal and thinking that many of their own brands could perhaps be packaged up into animated series as well.
Traditionally a television series would lead to spin-off opportunities for merchandising, as Teletubbies, Peppa Pig and countless other kids series have shown. But Rovio are showing us this is actually the wrong way round. It’s the product that comes first, and that television programming simply becomes another marketing channel. This approach was taken by Chorion Group some years ago Noddy – giving the series away for free to selected television networks knowing that the spin-off from DVD and merchandising sales would more than cover the cost of producing the television series.
Apparently an Angry Birds feature film is in the offing as well – though you’re going to have to wait until 2016 to see that.
What you didn’t know about Angry Bird:
#1 Original version launched on iOS December 2009
#2 Angry Birds fanatics include David Cameron, Kylie Minogue, Conan O’Brien, Jon Hamm & Don Draper
#3 Spin-off game “Bad Piggies” was launched in September 2012
#4 There’s an Angry Birds Land theme park in Finland
#5 The “Pig” enemies in Angry Birds were inspired because of Swine Flu
James Barnes, StatusCake.com
James Barnes
Share this
More from StatusCake
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 3)
5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t
James Barnes
March 18, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 2)
6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff
James Barnes
March 11, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)
5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything
James Barnes
March 4, 2026
Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
James Barnes
February 25, 2026
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026