Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
User experience (UX) is a major consideration for e-commerce firms in an ever-increasing competitive environment. While you may be focusing on personalizing the purchasing experience for your customers and minimizing the number of actions they need to take to complete a purchase, you should remember that UX also depends on the post-purchase experience you provide for your customers.
According to a recent study by consumer marketing firm Narvar, how your customers perceive their post-purchase experience can make the difference between a one-time customer and a loyal one that keeps returning to your site to make a purchase. Narvar surveyed more than 1,000 customers who purchased something online during the past 12 months and found that 49% worried about their package being damaged in transit and 42% thought that their package would not be delivered within the promised timeframe.
The study found that on-time delivery was a crucial factor in developing a positive UX leading to long-term customer relationships. About 60% of the respondents to the survey stated they were more likely to make a purchase from an e-commerce firm that provided a definite date for delivering their purchase, while 72% said that receiving an item on the promised delivery date was the number-one reason for making future purchases from that retailer.
Narvar found that the second most important factor in building long-term relationships with customers was to simplify the returns process, with 70% of the respondents stating that an easy exchange or return process would make them more likely to become repeat customers.
The study also noted the impact that Amazon has had on other e-commerce firms, as consumers are now holding them to the higher standard that Amazon created. The “Amazon effect,” which allowed the company to expand its market share by offering fast, free shipping and easy returns, no longer applies to just Amazon. Consumers now expect other e-commerce firms to provide the same level of customer service and are more likely to remain loyal to firms that do.
Narvar found that age was a factor in determining how customers preferred post-delivery interaction with e-commerce firms. Customers between the ages of 18 and 29 preferred email communication but were more receptive than older customers to receiving communications by Facebook Messenger, the retailer’s app and SMS/texts.
When asked what post-purchase information would make them more satisfied with the retailer, 61% said that a thank you message mattered the most. Other factors mentioned were personalized recommendations, examples of how other customers were using the product and recommendations on how to use the product. Customers under the age of 30 were more interested in seeing how others were using the product (37%) than those who were aged 30 or older (21%).
While devoting resources to personalizing consumer experience does improve UX, the study made it clear that e-commerce firms can benefit most by devoting more resources to basics of post-purchase UX: ensuring that products arrive on time and undamaged, making returns easy, and thanking their customers for making a purchase.
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 2)
6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff
James Barnes
March 11, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)
5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything
James Barnes
March 4, 2026
Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
James Barnes
February 25, 2026
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026