Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021



When you send a marketing email to your customers and prospects, you will often make a sale if the recipient clicks through to your website. Unfortunately, the increased smartphone use has caused a marked decrease in click-through rates on marketing emails even though the number of email openings on smartphones is increasing.
This declining rate is due to several factors. It is much more difficult to get someone to make a purchase commitment on a smartphone because it can be awkward for recipients to navigate a site on a smartphone, so they might opt to open the email later using a desktop or a laptop but never get around to doing so. It’s also possible your content isn’t compelling enough to entice the recipient to your site, or maybe you’ve used the same email template in the past, and the recipients are tired of seeing the same type of content.
Email marketing can be very effective in generating sales. Even though click-through rates on smartphones are declining, about one-third of online sales take place on mobile devices, so it’s worth your time to try to increase your click-through rate. Here are a few suggestions that could help.
Videos are very engaging, and they can help increase clicks and entice recipients to share them on social media, thereby increasing awareness of your brand. Video can be more effective than text in displaying your products or services.
Embedding video directly into the body of an email can adversely impact its delivery, so use an image with a play button on it instead. The button will give the appearance that the video will start playing when recipients click on it, but it will send them to a separate site where you host the video. Just be sure the loading time for the video is fast, or recipients might not wait around for it to finish loading.
Most of your customers are probably curious, so you may be able to entice them to click through to your site by offering them a “teaser.” For example, you could promote a sale and tell your customers in your email that they are entitled to a discount of 20%, 30% or 40%, but they need to click through to your site to find out how much they can save. You might even put a short time limit on how long the discounts are available (say three to four hours) to instill a sense of urgency. Many large retailers have experienced high conversion rates using this tactic, so it’s worth trying it.
It’s tempting to save money by using a standard email template rather than developing new content each time, but your customers may become bored with the same format and not bother to click through. Rotate your content to keep it fresh. You can highlight the most popular selling items on your site, or you could tailor promotions to your customers’ previous purchases. You could also provide gift-giving ideas for the various holidays throughout the year.
Email is still a viable marketing tool when you use it effectively.
Share this
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,
5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021