Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
Content Square, a firm that specialises in optimising website user experience (UX), spent two months last year recording the browsing behaviour of over 50 million users on thousands of websites. They developed a taxonomy that classified their behaviour into 16 categories. The categories (and the percentage of users that exhibited the behaviour associated with each category) were: economical (69%), comparator (49%), lazy (45%), hurried (23%), opportunistic (21%), experts (20%), loyal (15%), numb (13%), impulsive (12%), lost (12%), unsatisfied (11%), anxious (11%), connected (9%), beginners (9%), frustrated (6%) and ambassadors (0.5%). It’s worth looking at the top seven categories to see what the implications are for improving UX on your e-commerce site.
Economical users
Economical users are bargain hunters. They are attracted to sales and frequently use promotional codes. They also tend to view and sort items by price and spend about 25% less per visit than the average customer. Make your site more attractive for these users by prominently displaying bargain items on your home page.
Comparator users
Comparator users are your comparison shoppers. They will look at an item several times (often up to ten times), perhaps leaving your site going to your competitors to see if a better deal is available, before making a purchase. Make it easier for comparison shoppers to make a purchase by giving them the ability to make wish lists or save items in their check-out baskets, so they can easily find those items when they return to your site to make a purchase.
Lazy users
Lazy users don’t like to spend time filling out forms and opening accounts. They just want to visit your site, find what they want and make their purchase quickly. These users tend to abandon a site and go elsewhere when asked to open an account, so make it easy for customers to make a purchase without formally opening an account.
Hurried users
Hurried users spend very little time before interacting with a site. They make their first click in less than 30 seconds after accessing a site. They know what they want, and they want to find it quickly and buy it once they do. Make it easy for hurried users by having clear layouts on your product pages, and use a website monitoring service to ensure your pages are loading quickly.
Opportunistic users
Opportunistic users love sales and promotions. They love bargains, so they’ll wait until you’re having a sale before making a purchase. These users visit a site an average of five times before making a purchase, so make it easier for them by having email campaigns for your sales and seasonal promotions.
Expert users
Expert users know what they want to buy. They spend 700% less time on a site than the average user and view 400% fewer pages. Encourage these users with an email campaign that highlights items relating to their previous purchases.
Loyal users
Loyal users are extremely fond of your site and visit regularly, both to keep up with you latest offerings and to make purchases. They spend almost 300% more time on a site than average users, and their conversion rate is high. Reward them with a loyalty program to provide further motivation for them to return.
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026
The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
James Barnes
January 28, 2026
When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them
3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,
James Barnes
January 21, 2026
When AI Speeds Up Change, Knowing First Becomes the Constraint
5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things
James Barnes
January 14, 2026