Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
For many online retailers, the Christmas shopping season is the busiest time of the year for traffic and sales. Now that the peak season is past, you are probably thinking about what you want to do during the traditionally slower months at the beginning of the New Year. Having a plan is crucial if you wish to generate sales, so here are a few suggestions to consider as you plan for converting post-Christmas visits to you site into sales.
Do you want to offer discounts?
Your first step in developing a plan is to decide on your goal for what you wish to accomplish during the post-holiday period. If your goal is to reduce excess inventory of items that did not sell during the Christmas rush, you may want to offer discounts on those items. Similarly, if you need more cash flow, you might decide to offer discounts to raise cash quickly. Conversely, if you don’t need a cash infusion and don’t have excess inventory, you might want to concentrate on maintaining healthy profit margins, so offering discounts under that scenario would not be appropriate. You need to consider these factors when deciding whether to offer post-holiday discounts.
What can you offer in addition to discounts?
Even if you decide that discounts are appropriate, you should also consider what else you could offer customers to help foster long-term relationships. Perhaps you could focus on providing outstanding customer service after the sale, and perhaps you could combine the purchase of a product with a promotion. Your goal should be using that sale to give the customer a reason to keep on coming back to your site, and it’s probably best to offer more than just a low price to cement the relationship.
Can you sell complementary products?
Look at the products that customers bought during the Christmas rush and send them a follow-up email with an offer to buy items that complement those purchases or are accessories. For example, if a customer bought a game console, you could follow up with an offer to buy more games for that console, or if a customer bought a new winter jacket, you could send an offer to purchase gloves or a scarf. Your customers might not want to purchase unrelated new products after Christmas, but they might be willing to buy something they could use with a previous purchase.
Can you use the return process to generate additional sales?
Expect customers to return items after Christmas since many items are purchased as gifts, and wrong sizes and duplicate gifts are common. You want to keep your customers happy, so you want to make the return process as easy as possible. However, you might be able to both help your customers and generate additional revenue. For example, you could give your customers a choice of a refund for the return or a store credit of 10%-15% more than the cost of the item if they make a purchase in January. This way, you prevent having negative cash flow from giving a refund for a previous purchase.
Even the slow times after the holidays can benefit from planning.
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026
The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
James Barnes
January 28, 2026
When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them
3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,
James Barnes
January 21, 2026
When AI Speeds Up Change, Knowing First Becomes the Constraint
5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things
James Barnes
January 14, 2026