Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
One of the most important decisions you need to make when running a software-as-a-service (SaaS) company is your pricing strategy. Your cash flow (and survival as a business) depends on growing a customer base and securing a recurring source of revenue from those customers. For most SaaS companies, there are two main pricing strategies available – monthly billing and annual billing. Each strategy has its advantages and disadvantages, so consider these points as you decide on an appropriate pricing strategy for your business.
Monthly billing
Many SaaS companies use a monthly billing strategy. Monthly billing can expedite the acquisition of new customers, as their upfront cost is relatively low, making it easier for them to sign up for the service. Automatic recurring billing (and payment) can also make it very easy for customers to pay for the service and keep subscribing to it.
If you’re a start-up company, using a monthly billing strategy makes sense. New customers may be reluctant to make a long-term commitment upfront, especially if you have established competitors with good reputations. Your top priority as a start-up is to acquire an initial customer base, build trust with them and demonstrate to the marketplace that you can provide a reliable, valuable service.
The main downside to a monthly billing strategy is the possibility of a high churn rate. It is easy for a customer to cancel service after just a few months, and you most likely will not recover your upfront acquisition costs if a customer leaves you after a short time. That’s an example of why having adequate start-up capital is so important for a new company’s success.
Annual billing
For an established company, an annual billing strategy has several benefits. Perhaps the most important one is improved cash flow. With annual billing, you get 12 months of revenue upfront and immediately cover your customer acquisition costs. You’ve also reduced your churn rate and improved customer retention time to at least one year. This a 12-month commitment, so you have a longer time to show your customers the benefits of the service you provide, making contract renewal more likely.
On the downside, your total annual revenue per customer will probably be lower, as most SaaS companies that offer an annual billing option give a 15-20% discount to entice customers to switch from a monthly plan to an annual plan.
Combination of monthly and annual billing
Once you’ve made it past the start-up stage, giving your customers a choice between monthly and annual billing is a smart move. You will have some customers that won’t want to switch to an annual billing plan due to cash flow issues or other reasons, and you will lose these customers if you don’t have a monthly billing option. Once you’re established and have a good reputation, some new customers will initially sign up for discounted annual rates, so offering both monthly and annual options benefits both your customers and your cash flow.
Your website for marketing your services reflects on your ability to provide your services effectively, so be sure it makes a positive impression on potential customers. Consider using a website monitoring service, this way you promptly know if your site loading speed degrades or if your site goes down.
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026
The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
James Barnes
January 28, 2026
When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them
3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,
James Barnes
January 21, 2026
When AI Speeds Up Change, Knowing First Becomes the Constraint
5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things
James Barnes
January 14, 2026