Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
Children’s charity UNICEF has hit out with an advertising campaign slamming the way in which Internet users interact with its messaging on social media sites such as Facebook – suggesting that for most users the engagement with the charity starts and ends with the click of a “Like”.
The campaign, created ad agency Forsman & Bordenfors, highlights that although social media campaigns can raise awareness, the fear from UNICEF in Sweden is that members that of the public tend believe that their “Like” creates value – social currency – but it appears to have also contributed to a falling rate in donations being made. So called “slacktivists” get a sense of accomplishment and participation by liking or sharing a Facebook post or a re-Tweet, but in fact are doing very little at all. And it’s real hard cash rather than social currency that pays for immunisation and other aid programmes.
Three new adverts ram this message home – making a direct call from the public for cash donations. In one a 10 year old orphan, left to fend for himself and his younger brother looks to the camera:
“Sometimes I worry that I will get sick, like my mom got sick. But I think everything will be alright. Today, Unicef Sweden has 177,000 likes on Facebook.”
Another of the adverts, ironically being shared and liked widely on social media reads:
“Like us on Facebook, and we will vaccinate zero children against polio.”
The concerns of UNICEF mirror those raised by the Kony 2012 campaign; a slick You Tube film which was designed to raise awareness, and ultimately bring to justice, the Ugandan warlord Joseph Kony. But whilst the You Tube video gains millions of views and was shared widely it didn’t lead to wholesale activism – the lobbying of governments and international organisations. It ultimately failed.
So the challenge remains for any charitable organisation – spreading the word about your campaigns in a purely superficial way is one thing. Getting money through the door or getting people to act upon your message in other ways another.
James Barnes, StatusCake.com
James Barnes
Share this
More from StatusCake
Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
James Barnes
February 25, 2026
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026
The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
James Barnes
January 28, 2026
When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them
3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,
James Barnes
January 21, 2026