Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
You probably know how important it is to convert a one-time buyer into a repeat customer because it costs you more to obtain new customers than to retain existing ones. According to the Harvard Business Review, depending upon your industry, it is up to 25 times more expensive to gain a new customer than to keep an existing customer happy to do business with you. Not only does customer retention cost less, but it also gives a tremendous boost to your bottom line.
According to international management consulting firm Bain & Company, increasing customer retention by 5% can lead to a 25% or more increase in profits. That is why reducing customer churn is so important to your company’s long-term financial health. Here are three suggestions to help you accomplish that goal.
Thinking about churn and taking preventative action
One of the most difficult challenges in stopping customer churn is determining how best to measure it and when to reach out to customers you think you may be losing. If your business is subscription based, you know when customers leave because they have cancelled their subscription. With a traditional retail business the answer is not always clear-cut.
You cannot have a fixed rule that assumes a customer who hasn’t made a purchase in 60 days has churned. Some customers will make a purchase every week, while some regular customers will only make a purchase every six months. You need to analyze your customers’ purchasing behavior when you make decisions about reaching out to them to prevent them from leaving. Bombarding customers who purchase from you regularly but infrequently with promotional emails can drive them away rather than entice them to purchase more.
Segment your customers by the potential risk of churning
Once you have analyzed your customers’’ purchasing behavior, segment them according to the risk that they may leave. Identify those customers that are beginning to show signs of leaving, those who are likely to leave, and those you have already left. Then you can tailor your promotional emails based on the categories they are in. For example, you could send an email to customers you think may be in the process of leaving thanking them for their business. At the same time you could offer a small discount for making a purchase and a larger discount for customers you think have already left to try to win them back. You could further segment each category by varying the message to customers who purchase big-ticket items or other customer attributes.
Test one message at a time
There are many variables involved in customer behavior and expecting to design a perfect email message for each customer churn segment is unrealistic. Test emails for each risk segment. Slowly amend them and note which versions are most effective at getting customers to respond and make a purchase. Once you know what emails work best you can set up a process to automatically send out an email as customers enter each risk category.
An effective churn prevention program takes time to develop, however, the benefits make the effort extremely worthwhile.
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026
The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
James Barnes
January 28, 2026
When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them
3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,
James Barnes
January 21, 2026
When AI Speeds Up Change, Knowing First Becomes the Constraint
5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things
James Barnes
January 14, 2026