Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
Amazon.com launched its new virtual, digital currency this week. Amazon’s customers can now use Amazon “coins” to purchase games and apps from the online retailer.
Digital virtual currencies have come to the fore in recent months with the explosion of interest in Bitcoin and its meteoric rise in value. Although Amazon is not the first retailer to create a virtual digital currency; both Facebook with its Facebook Credits and Microsoft with its Microsoft Points have announced that they’re looking to phase out their own currencies. Microsoft announced in October that it would ditch Microsoft Points for Windows 8 whilst Facebook plans to switch Facebook Credits for local currencies and in-app subscriptions.
To mark the launch of Amazon Coins the company gave all its US Kindle Fire owners 500 free coins, each worth $0.01. Although Amazon Coin is initially only rolled out to its American customers, it’s likely that if it proves successful it will be rolled out into other geographic markets.
But the question is what benefit, if any, does Amazon Coin give to the consumer?
Although with bulk purchases of Amazon Coin consumers will be able to get up to 10% off – the retailer is offering 500 coins for a 4% discount; 2, 500 coins for an 8% discount and 5,000 coins for a 10% – that’s about as far as the incentive to use them goes. It appears little more than a way for consumers to budget or save in advance for future Amazon purchases. And although Amazon Coins do not expire there’s nothing to say that Amazon might devalue the coins in the future. 1,000 coins today might not necessarily be worth the same amount a year down the track.
Customers taking to forums and reviews made it clear that they felt there was no advantage in using Amazon Coin. Many complained that the types of items you could purchase was limited, and that it was easier and quicker just to use real money!
It’s worth noting though that it’s only early days. And Amazon Coin will most likely look very different six months from now; as highlighted by Amazon themselves:
“We will continue to add more ways to earn and spend Coins on a wider range of content and activities – today is day one for Coins.”
What does this mean for Amazon?
Could this mean Amazon expanding Amazon Coins into a type of loyalty programme, gamification model. Where cash-back is given in the form of Amazon Coin (much like the trading stamps of old – Green Shield for example), drive the promotion of particular items with “1,000 free Coins”, or even offer Amazon Coins for each review written or encourage marketplace sellers by offering them coins for every item they list – might fees likewise be payable in Amazon Coin?
App developers will also earn the standard 70% revenue share when Amazon customers purchase their apps using Amazon Coin, though it’s difficult to see how this might create the “new opportunities” for developers that Amazon suggests it will.
Unless Amazon does have grander plans for Amazon Coins, such as suggested above, is this little more than a simple way of boosting cash-flow – hoping thousands of customers will simply pay up front for Amazon Coin and not spend them?
James Barnes, StatusCake.com
James Barnes
Share this
More from StatusCake
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)
5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything
James Barnes
March 4, 2026
Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
James Barnes
February 25, 2026
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026
The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
James Barnes
January 28, 2026