Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
SaaS companies have many metrics available to measure their performance. The question is – which ones should you choose? There is no one ideal metric that you should use, and you can’t measure every available metric at the same time. Depending on where you are on your company’s growth path, there are different things you need to measure to get a handle on your company’s health. That is why it is so important to focus on a specific metric at each stage to ensure you are heading in the right direction.
Of course, you need to know which growth stage you are at to know which metric to use. Sometimes it is tricky to determine this, but it is crucial to know where you are on the growth path to avoid miscalculations that can cause your company to falter. Some companies overestimate their growth stage and try to scale up too quickly. If you act as if your company is at a higher stage than it is and do not use the metrics that are appropriate to your actual size, you will not have a sustainable business. Here are the five growth stages of a SaaS company and the appropriate metrics to use at each stage.
Very early stage
At this stage, you are building a business from the ground up, so you want to validate that you have a viable service that someone is willing to buy. You want to measure unaffiliated conversions – no friends or family members included, If you can get ten paying customers, that is a good indicator that you have a viable concept.
Early stage
At this stage, you’re trying to determine if you have a business that is economically sustainable. You need to measure your customer’s lifetime value (LTV) and your customer acquisition cost (CAC), and then calculate the ratio of LTV to CAC. The ratio needs to be at least 3 to 1 for your company to be profitable. If it’s not, your company is not sustainable.
Bridging stage
At this stage, you’re making sure that your business strategy is solid before you begin to scale-up and grow. You want to have a repeatable sales process in place, and you want to have an effective lead generation strategy. You want to measure your monthly recurring revenue (MRR) and be sure you are meeting your revenue goals.
Growth and scale stage
At this stage, you want to measure your customer retention rate to see if you are building customer loyalty. You want your MRR gain from new customers to exceed your MRR loss from customers who stop buying your service. It’s much harder to replace lost customers as you grow, so you need to focus on providing excellent service and keeping your retention rate high.
Maturity stage
At this stage, you want to measure accurately your recognized revenue, which is the revenue you have received from customers for services you have delivered to them. You want to make sure you don’t include deferred revenue since you would be overstating your profitability, which could lead you to make unsound financial decisions.
Grow your company one step at a time, and use the appropriate metric at each step.
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
AI Didn’t Kill the SDLC. It Made It Harder to See
10 min read Whilst AI has compressed the visible stages of software delivery; requirements, validation, review and release discipline have not disappeared. They have been pushed into automation, runtime and governance. The real risk is not that the lifecycle is dead, but that organisations start acting as if accountability died with it. There is a now-familiar story about
James Barnes
April 2, 2026
When Code Becomes Cheap: The New Reliability Constraint in Software Engineering
4 min read How AI Is Shifting Software Engineering’s Primary Constraint For most of the history of software engineering, the primary constraint was production. Code was expensive, skilled engineers were scarce, and shipping features required concentrated human effort. Velocity was limited by how fast people could reason, implement, test, and deploy. That constraint shaped everything from team size,
James Barnes
March 25, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 3)
5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t
James Barnes
March 18, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 2)
6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff
James Barnes
March 11, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)
5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything
James Barnes
March 4, 2026
Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
James Barnes
February 25, 2026