StatusCake

CNAME Your Public Reporting Page

website monitoring

The StatusCake.com public reporting pages are a great way to let the world know how great your website uptime is – and it’s these public reporting pages which we have spent some time working on recently. We know from feedback that people don’t like the fact that they have to use the StatusCake domain to show their public reporting page.  So we’re happy to announce that from today you are now able to setup CNAMEs for public reporting pages.

How to set up CNAME

To setup a CNAME just point your domain to uptime.statuscake.com . Once you have pointed your domain you can go into the Users tab within your StatusCake website monitoring account and type the domain you wish to use.

Beyond the ability to use a CNAME for public reporting pages we’ve also spruced up the overall design and usability of the public reporting pages – and we’ve got a lot more coming soon (including the ability to privately share). Traditional non-CNAME’ed public reporting will remain in the old style into migration later this month (once all features are ported).

At StatusCake we’re always looking for all feedback and feature requests for the new public reporting page so please do get in touch via email, Twitter or Live Chat!

Share this

More from StatusCake

AI Didn’t Kill the SDLC. It Made It Harder to See

10 min read Whilst AI has compressed the visible stages of software delivery; requirements, validation, review and release discipline have not disappeared. They have been pushed into automation, runtime and governance. The real risk is not that the lifecycle is dead, but that organisations start acting as if accountability died with it. There is a now-familiar story about

When Code Becomes Cheap: The New Reliability Constraint in Software Engineering

4 min read How AI Is Shifting Software Engineering’s Primary Constraint For most of the history of software engineering, the primary constraint was production. Code was expensive, skilled engineers were scarce, and shipping features required concentrated human effort. Velocity was limited by how fast people could reason, implement, test, and deploy. That constraint shaped everything from team size,

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 3)

5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 2)

6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)

5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything

Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System

3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting

Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?

Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021

*By providing your email address, you agree to our privacy policy and to receive marketing communications from StatusCake.