Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
You’d be right to think that Tesla’s technology surely wouldn’t go wrong, especially with the huge amounts of media coverage it gets. But in 2021, Tesla suffered a few awkward technological faults.
You may have read that Tesla went offline which lead to customers around the world reporting issues around gaining access to their cars. It may sound comical seeing someone struggling to access their car but imagine the frustration; lateness to work, to appointments, to important life tasks. So is this something we should come to expect with many vehicles becoming keyless?
Manufacturers are becoming more and more technology-dependent with many vehicles now being managed through apps so there will be times when the technology will not work as well as we expect it to work, just like online websites, for example.
Tesla’s update
TESLA had recently launched a new update on their app which is used by most customers to access and manage their vehicle usage and needs. Through the app customers can use the phone as a key to unlock and lock the car, access service information and also buy and upgrade their packages. It was suspected that this update caused a domino-effect of issues, which were first reported in US and Canada but soon Europe and Asia started to report the same problem.
How did Tesla find out?
It was first reported in the US by Tesla customers after they attempted to get in the car but quite simply, found that they couldn’t. Once they managed to access their car, they found out that they couldn’t start it. The car was “offline” and not responding to any requests. Subsequently, the same issue was then reported across the world, with some very unhappy customers.
Across social media Tesla owners were flooding the pages with issues they were experiencing, and lucky for them it also meant that Tesla staff were also made aware of the issue. They soon posted an update to let all their customers know they were working on the issue and and trying to get a fix in place.
What caused the outage for Tesla?
Many things can cause an outage, but when you have thousands of customers dependant on you to find a solution, you need to work quickly. Because Tesla had recently launched their app update to improve customer experience (the irony), it was suspected that this was the root cause for the outage. After an hour or so of investigation, Tesla found that it was the upgrade that had caused this huge technical fault and you know it’s serious when Elon Musk himself takes to Twitter to give an update:
“Should be coming back online now. Looks like we may have accidentally increased verbosity of network traffic”
True to his word. the network was back online soon after but this now begs the question – should Tesla risk doing this sort of upgrade globally without checking if their network can actually handle the changes and the pressure that their servers wil be experiencing. Elon also stated that “we will take measure to ensure this doesn’t happen again” but how true this is is yet to be determined!
What we can learn from this story is that no company is “too big” to have technical issues such as network outages or app upgrades that prove detrimental. I guess we should all start with the basics on this one and make sure that we monitor our network to avoid any prolong outages. In this instant, Tesla managed the situation well and got a fix live quickly but not every company has that capacity. It might we worth them launching any updates in a smaller number to help identify any potential issues before doing a global update.
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026
A Notification List Is Not a Team
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
James Barnes
February 11, 2026
Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision
3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.
James Barnes
February 4, 2026
The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most
4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already
James Barnes
January 28, 2026
When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them
3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,
James Barnes
January 21, 2026
When AI Speeds Up Change, Knowing First Becomes the Constraint
5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things
James Barnes
January 14, 2026