Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
There is a good reason why brick-and-mortar retailers spend a lot of time and effort on their counter displays and store windows. Their goal is to provide their customers with as much visual content as possible to entice them to buy their merchandise. The same principle holds true for online retailers. A recent study by international e-commerce consulting firm Episerver demonstrates just how important the content of a website is to convince visitors to become customers.
Episerver surveyed 1,112 consumers who had made an online purchase within the past year. The company found that 98% of the respondents had not made a purchase on at least one of the sites they visited due to incomplete or incorrect content. When aggregated across all sites visited, a percentage breakdown of the specific reasons for not making a purchase was price concerns (65%), difficult-to-navigate website (42%), found a product that better suited needs elsewhere (39%), difficult check-out process (34%), slow loading website (29%), incomplete content (21%), incorrect content (14%) and non-personalized shopping experience (4%).
Another problem noted by the study was inconsistent customer expectation based on website content, with 37% of the respondents stating they had received a product that looked different from the product they saw online. Also, 27% of the respondents said they had received a product that did not match the description on the website.
These inconsistent expectations also had a significant financial impact on the retailers, with 48% of the respondents saying they had returned a product that had not met their expectations. The study noted that returns cost retailers billions and that the amount is expected to increase as the volume of online sales continues to increase.
The study also found that 92% of the respondents visited a website for the first time for reasons other than to make a purchase. About 45% said that they visited a website to search for products and learn more about them, 26% visited to make a price comparison, and 11% were looking for more information about a retailer. Only 9% said they made their first visit to a website specifically to make a purchase.
The study concluded that online retailers needed to spend more time concentrating on website content and the quality of the interactions consumers had with their site.
Commenting on the study, Ed Kennedy, Episerver’s senior director of commerce, said: “Our study shows consumers really care about content when shopping online, not only the quality and accuracy but also how it’s delivered to them. Complete and accurate content is now table stakes, and brands looking to go above and beyond must consider personalization.
“What shoppers see on a website or mobile app, and how it is delivered to them, can make or break their final decision to make a purchase. Consumers expect the content they’re shown to be relevant, accurate, and, increasingly, customized to their preferences and location. To compete in 2017, strong content is no longer negotiable.”
StatusCake Team
Share this
More from StatusCake
Engineering
Beyond Uptime: Building a Self-Healing OpenClaw Observability Stack
3 min read The allure of OpenClaw is undeniable. You deploy a highly autonomous, self-hosted AI agent, give it access to your repositories and inboxes, and watch it reason through complex workflows while you sleep. It is the dream of the ultimate 10x developer tool realized. But as any veteran DevOps engineer will tell you: running an LLM-backed
Daniel
April 23, 2026
When AWS us-east-1 Fails, Much of the Internet Fails With It
7 min read There are cloud outages, and then there are us-east-1 outages. That distinction matters because failures in AWS’s Northern Virginia region rarely feel like ordinary regional incidents. They tend instead to expose something larger and more uncomfortable: too much of the modern internet still behaves as though one place is an acceptable concentration point for infrastructure,
James Barnes
April 15, 2026
In the Age of AI, Operational Memory Matters Most During Incidents
7 min read Artificial intelligence is making software easier to produce. That much is already obvious. Code that once took hours to scaffold can now be drafted in minutes. Boilerplate, integration logic, tests, refactors and small internal tools can be generated with startling speed. In some cases, even substantial pieces of implementation can be assembled quickly enough to
James Barnes
April 10, 2026
AI Didn’t Kill the SDLC. It Made It Harder to See
10 min read Whilst AI has compressed the visible stages of software delivery; requirements, validation, review and release discipline have not disappeared. They have been pushed into automation, runtime and governance. The real risk is not that the lifecycle is dead, but that organisations start acting as if accountability died with it. There is a now-familiar story about
James Barnes
April 2, 2026
When Code Becomes Cheap: The New Reliability Constraint in Software Engineering
4 min read How AI Is Shifting Software Engineering’s Primary Constraint For most of the history of software engineering, the primary constraint was production. Code was expensive, skilled engineers were scarce, and shipping features required concentrated human effort. Velocity was limited by how fast people could reason, implement, test, and deploy. That constraint shaped everything from team size,
James Barnes
March 25, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 3)
5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t
James Barnes
March 18, 2026