StatusCake

Boosting eCommerce Sales of Hard-to-Sell Items

statuscake

It happens even to major e-commerce retailers. You have an excellent item that is well-made and should meet your customers’ needs and expectations, yet the item does not sell very well. Most online retailers will eventually place that item in their clearance section, yet often it still doesn’t sell. In fact, many retailers have well-made, well-designed functional items in their clearance section that sit for months before finally selling.

There are several reasons why quality items sometimes do not sell quickly. Perhaps the item is not prominently displayed. Unless it is a high-demand product that people are regularly searching for, just adding it to your site will not automatically generate sales. You need to showcase some items to attract customers.

Pricing can also be an issue. Your competitors may be selling the item at a lower price, or customers might view a product with a low price as a product with low quality and avoid buying it. Adjusting your prices might be the solution in these cases.

Another possibility is an inadequate product description. Sometimes, providing more information about how a product works or how a product can meet consumers’ needs can improve sales.

Sometimes however, even making improvements in display, price and presentation will not be enough to get those items to sell. Here are three strategies worth trying in those cases.

Comparison pricing

Most shoppers like to look at alternatives before making a purchase, so make it easy for customers to compare the hard-to-sell-product with similar products that are priced higher. This way, they can see the value in the first product and are more likely to buy it. This price comparison process is called anchoring and major retailers have had great success when using it.

Bracketing is a very effective price comparison strategy if you’re trying to sell a mid-range product. Show your customers three products on the same page: a low-end product, a mid-range product and a high-end product. When you display three products at varying prices, many consumers will choose the one in the middle. This pricing strategy is also very effective in promoting SaaS and other service websites.

Volume discounts

Offering a volume discount has several benefits. When an item is popular, a volume discount can increase sales even further as customers take advantage of the discount and buy multiple items. For hard-to-sell items, the effect is psychological. The volume discount makes the item appear more popular than it really is, and the perceived popularity will entice some customers to make a purchase that they may not otherwise make.

Give the impression of scarcity

Another psychological tactic is to convey the idea that the item is scarce. If you have no intention of reordering an item, you can label the item on the product description page as “limited quantities available.” If a customer is undecided about making a purchase, the implied scarcity may be enough to get the customer off the fence and make a purchase.

Sometimes customers need a bit of coaxing.

Share this

More from StatusCake

Designing Alerts for Action

3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams

A Notification List Is Not a Team

3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years

Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision

3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.

The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most

4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already

When Things Go Wrong, Systems Should Help Humans — Not Fight Them

3 min read In the previous post, we explored how AI accelerates delivery and compresses the time between change and user impact. As velocity increases, knowing that something has gone wrong before users do becomes a critical capability. But detection is only the beginning. Once alerts fire and dashboards light up, humans still have to interpret what’s happening,

When AI Speeds Up Change, Knowing First Becomes the Constraint

5 min read In a recent post, I argued that AI doesn’t fix weak engineering processes; rather it amplifies them. Strong review practices, clear ownership, and solid fundamentals still matter just as much when code is AI-assisted as when it’s not. That post sparked a follow-up question in the comments that’s worth sitting with: With AI speeding things

Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?

Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021

*By providing your email address, you agree to our privacy policy and to receive marketing communications from StatusCake.