StatusCake

Average Performance and Availability of Travel Websites in 2019

The first couple of months of the year are typically the busiest for travel companies, with prospective holiday makers keen to shake off the post-Christmas blues, by planning a trip away to sunnier climes. Unsurprisingly, the travel and tourism business is one of the world’s largest industries, contributing 7.6 trillion U.S. dollars (direct, indirect and induced) to the global economy in 2016.

With travel being such big business, and with 81 percent of people booking their holidays online in 2018, it is imperative that travel companies maintain reliable websites with fast load times. This is particularly true as hotel rooms and plane tickets are sold in real time and are limited in quantity. Indeed, research undertaken by Akamai has demonstrated that underperforming travel websites result in lost sales. They found that 79 percent of online shoppers who experience a dissatisfying visit are less likely to buy from that site again, while 64 percent would simply purchase from another website.

This is why we here at StatusCake decided to make use of our website uptime monitoring software, to get a detailed picture of the average performance of websites in the travel industry, and to understand how well they fare according to our own average website uptime benchmarks. We were able to convert uptime percentages into monthly and yearly downtime in days, hours and minutes by referring to the StatusCake Uptime and Downtime Cheat Sheet.

Methodology

To analyse the average performance of websites in the travel industry, StatusCake tested the availability of the homepage of 47 travel domains every ten minutes over the period of 21st January – 21st February 2019 (inclusive). If a website was unavailable when tested in this period, an error was recorded. Over the course of this month-long testing period, average uptime was calculated by the number of times the availability of a particular domain was tested, divided by the number of times an error was recorded. Therefore, a domain with 100 percent uptime was available every time it was tested in this period, while a domain with 0 percent uptime was down every time it was tested.

We calculated load time by testing from the point after which the DNS lookup ends to the point at which the page has fully loaded. This calculation takes into consideration account files and images, but does not include scripts, such as JavaScript and Ajax. Load time was calculated to the nearest millisecond, and forms an accurate picture of the type of load time the typical end user would experience.

Overall Performance of Travel Websites

In our testing period, the average uptime of domains in the travel industry was 99.91 percent. This meets, and just exceeds, our recognised standard of 99.90 percent minimum average uptime. Nevertheless, this average uptime still equates to over 6 hours of average downtime per month, and over three full days over the course of the year!

In terms of load time, the average performance was 0.46 seconds. This is respectable, and beats out the 2 second threshold that research has shown consumers have come to expect.

Best Performing Travel Websites

Over the course of our month long testing period from 21st January – 21st February 2019, we found that 23 of the 47 domains tested experienced no downtime at all. Of the 49 percent of travel websites that experienced 100 percent uptime in this period, the average load time was 0.36 seconds, 22 percent faster than the average across all websites tested, suggesting a correlation between load time and website reliability which we have previously observed in similar tests elsewhere.

In order to determine which is the best performing website in terms of speed and reliability, we looked at 23 websites that experienced no downtime at all and filtered these domains by average load time. This approach identified Carnival Corporation and PLC as the best performing website overall, with an average load time of just 0.08 seconds.

Worst Performing Travel Websites

Overall, we have seen that the travel websites we tested performed on average exceeded the recognised standard of 99.90 minimum average uptime. Nevertheless, it is also true that over half of the travel websites experienced at least some degree of downtime in the testing period.

Of these, seven websites experienced almost perfect average uptime of 99.99 percent. Indeed, 18 of the 24 domains who experienced a period of downtime in this period, remained above the 99.90 percent minimum average uptime standard. This leave 6 websites which fell short of the 99.90 benchmark. These websites experienced average downtime in this one month period ranging from 1 hour 26 minutes, to 9 hours 22 minutes.

NST, the educational travel group, has the unfortunate distinction of being the poorest performing travel website in terms of average uptime of those tested in this period. With an average uptime of 98.74 percent (the only sub 99 percent average in the test), this would equate to over 4 days worth of downtime when extrapolated over the course of a year!

In terms of load time, however, it was Super Break which performed the poorest, with an average load time of 2.9 seconds. This does not necessarily constitute a slow website, but it was one of only two websites in the test who posted load times of more than 2 seconds (the other being CV Villas), the threshold for which consumers expect websites to load at.

Conclusion

Our aim in carrying out this research was to test the performance of a highly competitive industry, at a period of the year in which demand is typically at its highest.

What we found was a strong overall performance across the board, with just under half of the websites tested experiencing no downtime at all over the course of the month. Load time was equally impressive, with just 2 domains failing to meet the 2 second load time which consumers expect. Crucially, we found that 41 of the 47 website met or exceeded our own average uptime benchmarks of 99.90 percent.

Elsewhere, there was certainly room for improvement, with a major travel provider such as First Choice seeing average uptime of 99.29 percent, which could equate to almost three days of downtime if repeated throughout the course of the year.

Ultimately, the positives and negatives highlighted here emphasises the need for websites to invest in dedicated website uptime monitoring services, which will alert you instantly the moment your site goes down. StatusCake provide a suite of performance monitoring tools which are easy to set-up and use, and provide you with invaluable insights into how your website’s performance is impacting your customers’ experiences.

Click here, to start your free trial today.

Share this

More from StatusCake

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)

5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything

Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System

3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting

Designing Alerts for Action

3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams

A Notification List Is Not a Team

3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years

Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision

3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.

The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most

4 min read In the previous post, we looked at what happens after detection; when incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones, with cognitive load as the real constraint. This post assumes that context. The question here is simpler and more practical. What actually helps teams think clearly and act well once things are already

Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?

Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021

*By providing your email address, you agree to our privacy policy and to receive marketing communications from StatusCake.