StatusCake

Alternative to MonitorScout.com

computer-screen

Are you a web master?

Do you run your own ecommerce site?  Perhaps you write a blog?  If you do you’ll know that it’s important that when hard-earned visitors come to your site they find it up – there’s nothing worse for killing reputation than visitors coming to your website and finding it down.

And with free website monitoring there’s no excuse for not knowing if your website is down or not!  A website monitoring account is quick to set-up and easy to use.  And if you’re looking for an alternative to MonitorScout.com then the best web site monitoring service is StatusCake.com.

With StatusCake our free website monitoring allows you to test an unlimited number of URLs and websites for downtime.  Compare this with MonitorScout where you can carry out only 15 tests.

It’s also worth noting that Monitor Scout’s website monitoring appears to be free only whilst it’s in BETA – and the BETA is available for only a limited number of users.   At StatusCake.com we are committed to ensuring that our free unlimited monitoring is free forever.  No sudden charges when a free trial ends – and we’re certainly not in BETA.

Sign-up for a StatusCake website monitoring account today and make sure you’re the first to know when there’s a problem with your website.

Share this

More from StatusCake

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 2)

6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)

5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything

Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System

3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting

Designing Alerts for Action

3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams

A Notification List Is Not a Team

3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years

Alert Noise Isn’t an Accident — It’s a Design Decision

3 min read In a previous post, The Incident Checklist: Reducing Cognitive Load When It Matters Most, we explored how incidents stop being purely technical problems and become human ones. These are moments where decision-making under pressure and cognitive load matter more than perfect root cause analysis. When systems don’t support people clearly in those moments, teams compensate.

Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?

Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021

*By providing your email address, you agree to our privacy policy and to receive marketing communications from StatusCake.