StatusCake

Alternative To SiteUptime.com

website monitoring

If you’re looking for an alternative to SiteUptime website monitoring services then you should take a look at the free and paid plans offered by StatusCake.com.

StatusCake believes in free unlimited website monitoring.

So unlike many of our competitors the moment you want to monitor more than one website, IP or URL for example, you’re not pushed onto a prohibitive expensive paid plan. At SiteUptime for example if you’re looking to monitor more than one website you’ll have to sign up for a paid plan.

And what’s more on a free plan with SiteUptime your website will only be checked every 30 minutes. What happens if your website goes down for 25 minutes and the downtime is missed? Will your customers really come back? Do you really mind loosing that revenue? At StatusCake free website monitoring doesn’t mean waiting an age for your website to be checked. We offer 5 minute monitoring on your websites – however many websites you’ve got!

Free Website Monitoring

SiteUptime StatusCake
Websites Monitored 1 Unlimited
Monitoring Frequency 30 Minutes 5 Minutes
Real User Monitoring No Yes
Set Your Own Time Zone No Yes
Ping Monitoring No Yes
Multiple Alert Contacts No Yes
Graphical Reports No Yes
Maintenance Window No Yes
SSL Server / HTTPS No Yes
SMS Alerts No Yes
Public Reporting No Yes

Premium Website Monitoring – More Frequent Monitoring

SiteUptime StatusCake
Monthly Cost $5.00 $4.99
Websites Monitored 1 Unlimited
Monitoring Frequency 30 Minutes 5 Minutes
Public Status Page No Yes
Custom Ports No Yes

As with many competitor website monitoring services if you want to add extra websites to monitor or increase the frequency of monitoring, the costs quickly add up. The cost of monitoring just 5 websites on a frequency of 2 minutes would cost you $34 .00 per month with SiteUptime compared with just $4.99 with StatusCake. And of course with SiteUptime if you want to add even more sites the costs will keep rocketing – whereas with StatusCake whether it’s 1, 10, 100 or 1,000 sites you want to monitor the cost to you stays the same!

Share this

More from StatusCake

AI Didn’t Kill the SDLC. It Made It Harder to See

10 min read Whilst AI has compressed the visible stages of software delivery; requirements, validation, review and release discipline have not disappeared. They have been pushed into automation, runtime and governance. The real risk is not that the lifecycle is dead, but that organisations start acting as if accountability died with it. There is a now-familiar story about

When Code Becomes Cheap: The New Reliability Constraint in Software Engineering

4 min read How AI Is Shifting Software Engineering’s Primary Constraint For most of the history of software engineering, the primary constraint was production. Code was expensive, skilled engineers were scarce, and shipping features required concentrated human effort. Velocity was limited by how fast people could reason, implement, test, and deploy. That constraint shaped everything from team size,

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 3)

5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 2)

6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff

Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)

5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything

Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System

3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting

Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?

Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021

*By providing your email address, you agree to our privacy policy and to receive marketing communications from StatusCake.