Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021



Most of the major retailers in the UK have websites that are mobile-friendly, but slow website loading time and the lack of a guest checkout feature are costing them billions in lost revenue.
A study by online retail specialist Summit looked at the UK’s 50 top retailers to show how they could improve their mobile and online activities. Included in the study were John Lewis, Sainsbury’s, Harrods, Tesco, Morrisons, and Screwfix.
The study found that the average loading time across all 50 retailers was about seven seconds, which is twice the recommended minimum time. Summit stated that each second above the recommended minimum time cost the retailers 7% in converted sales, which translates into about £1 billion in lost revenue each year.
With regard to guest checkout, the study found that only 38% of the companies surveyed provided that function. With an estimated 25% of online customers leaving an e-commerce website that required registration, Summit estimated that the lack of a guest checkout feature cost the retailers an additional £1 billion in lost revenue each year.
A similar study of 100 online retailers conducted by Bronto Software found that 33% of the companies surveyed did not provide a guest checkout function. This study found that the lack of a guest checkout option required customers to fill out forms on around five pages, with some sites requiring customers to provide information on up to nine pages.
Commenting on the Summit report, TCC Global Global Insights Director Bryan Roberts said: “Even pure play retailers, often held up as being the best-of-the-best when it comes to e-commerce, offer plenty of room for improvement from end-to-end, which is surprising. Shoppers wouldn’t put up with slow service in-store, and the same applies online. Slow site speeds and complex checkout functions can all result in an abandoned basket, just as a long queue can force shoppers into leaving a store.”
In addition to looking at page loading speed and guest checkout options, Summit also looked at the logistics and delivery options offered by the retailers. While 87% offered a click-and-collect feature, most companies surveyed did not offer flexible delivery options. Only 46% offered customers the ability to select the day that they wanted delivery, and only 24% provided the ability to select both the day and time of delivery.
Summit Co-Founder and CEO Hedley Aylott said: “The Summit Scorecard provides us with an understanding of what the top 50 UK retailers are really like to shop with online. While retailers have made huge strides, with most now getting mobile right, many are still struggling to offer delivery options that meet shoppers’ needs. While this will not be an easy fix, no-one in retail needs further convincing or evidence of the importance of the online experience on overall profitability. These results are confirmation that there is still a lot of room for improvement, highlighting the real opportunity for retailers to fix some of the basics.”
On a positive note, the Summit report noted that 92% of the retailers surveyed had a website that was mobile-friendly, an important consideration given the growing trend for consumers to use mobile devices to make purchases online.
Share this
5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t
6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff
5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
3 min read In the previous post, we looked at how alert noise is rarely accidental. It’s usually the result of sensible decisions layered over time, until responsibility becomes diffuse and response slows. One of the most persistent assumptions behind this pattern is simple. If enough people are notified, someone will take responsibility. After more than fourteen years
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021